To be blamed or to blame is a means of different perspectives
One will be casted as the accuser
The other as the accused
When all roles are taken into account
That’s when the show truly begins
But who is the judge?
I’m not talking about the actual judges but figuratively what actually determines our actions for better or worse
One simple human being cannot truly justify the wrongs and the rights
But really who can anyways?
And no don’t bring God Into this discussion I’m directly asking this of the human race
Who will be able to determine right from wrong without a concious of a doubt
And there’s also this other question unreadable to most people
Is it bad not to believe in a right or wrong?
If so then
Where do we draw the line?
Is a question that many voice about but the thing is
The line was never meant to be drawn
Everything is just fabricated strings of listless illegitimate emotions and thoughts
Judged upon how we feel it should be like
not exactly what it should be
I heard that a woman once got sentenced to jail for 20 years cause she fired a round
Even though her husband was assualting and abusing them
However this time he went too far into the point of no return
He straight up tried to strangle them, wrangle them, kill her dead
She didn’t shoot him
Not at all
No casualties were lost
Except her freedom was compromised
For Almost committing an even greater sin then the one she didn’t deserve to have
She was still the victim subjected to a crime she didn’t commit
She was brought up to the podium being judged for a hit and miss in pure self defense
And the husband was never put up front
Now can anyone tell me what’s with that description?
I wonder when the true definition of right and wrong will be revealed
That is if there was truly a right and wrong to begin with
However It’s up to you the judge to decide on that statement
Could you figure out who’s in the wrong?
Or will you punish the innocent and leave the guilty unscathed
Or perhaps you would be the Undecided
Better yet a Neutral party